Coinbase’s latest acquisition caused controversial 10X token boom – Who knew?

Coinbase’s latest acquisition caused controversial 10X token boom – Who knew?

The snatch-and-split: Coinbase grabs Vector, leaves the token behind

Short version: Coinbase bought Vector.fun — a lightning-fast Solana DEX aggregator — but didn’t take the whole kitchen. They picked up the team and the plumbing, while the NFT marketplace and the TNSR token stayed with the Tensor Foundation. Translation: Coinbase took the engine, left the dashboard and the steering wheel for someone else.

Vector’s real value was its routing layer: the thing that spots new tokens as soon as they land on-chain, shoos trades through the cheapest pools, and generally makes rapid-fire trading possible on Solana. For a big exchange that wants to say “we’ve got native DEX speed,” that’s a delicious toy to steal — I mean, acquire.

But by leaving TNSR and the NFT marketplace behind, Coinbase neatly sidestepped the messy token-governance entanglement. Great for legal cleanliness, not so great for anyone holding the token that just got hollowed out of its core utility.

The chaos after the “deal” and why people are hollering

Here’s where it gets spicy: TNSR jumped from basically pennies to an 11x pop in a couple of days, then dumped back down hard. Volume went from sleepy to nuclear — hundreds of millions, then billions in trading — right around the acquisition window. That kind of move smells a lot like someone got wind of the deal early, scooped up tokens, and rode the pump before the news hit the rest of the market.

Investors and observers weren’t subtle about their frustration. The gripe is simple: equity holders of a company get the payoff when tech is bought; token holders get left holding a governance token for a marketplace that just lost the thing that made it interesting. Ouch.

Beyond the ethical eyebrow-raise, this has real consequences. If selling off infrastructure while keeping the token becomes the playbook, why would anyone pay meaningful money for governance tokens? They become speculative confetti — great for day traders, terrible for people who actually want decentralized stakes.

There’s also an optics problem. Coinbase sells itself as a clean, compliant onramp for serious capital. If massive pre-announcement volume and a subsequent windfall for early buyers becomes a pattern around acquisitions, that shiny reputation gets scratched. Regulators and institutions notice these things.

Fixes are trickier than you’d think. Buybacks, payouts to token holders, or converting tokens into equity all sound fair, but each option trips over legal, regulatory, or practical hurdles. A buyback might invite securities questions. Equity conversion feels like admitting the token was basically an investment contract. And mandatory payouts set a precedent that could hamstring future deals.

So where does that leave us? Developers and venture folks may start to prefer plain old equity exits over token-heavy structures if token holders get systematically shortchanged. That nudges capital formation back toward traditional VC models and away from the decentralized ideals that tokens were supposed to champion.

Bottom line: Coinbase got a speed advantage for its DEX play — and that’s smart from a product perspective. But by taking the tech without the token baggage, the deal highlights a growing tension in crypto: who actually benefits when the building blocks of decentralized projects get sliced and sold?

Funny, chaotic, and a little depressing: welcome to modern crypto M&A. Hold your popcorn and maybe your tokens a little closer.