Why Circle Survived the Crypto IPO Hangover (and Most Others Didn’t)
Remember when every crypto IPO looked like a gold star on the capitalism bingo card? Fast-forward to the end of the year: one issuer is still standing tall, a few barely tumbled, and several others face-planting so hard they left skid marks on their ticker symbols. This is the short, messy story of why some 2025 crypto listings shrugged off the market wobble while others went from debut party to exit stage left.
Two IPO playbooks: reliable plumbing vs. thrill-ride exchanges
Not all crypto companies are built the same. Some sell steady, boring plumbing — think stablecoin rails, custody services, and staking infrastructure — while others are thrill rides that live and die by retail FOMO: trading platforms and exchanges. The difference matters more than you think.
Take the steady-plumbing crowd. Their revenue often comes from things that don’t care whether Bitcoin is partying at $100k or sulking at $50k. Stablecoin issuers, for example, can earn the spread on reserve yields. Staking providers collect fees as long as proof-of-stake networks validate blocks. Those business models are basically the corporate equivalent of a dependable coffee machine: they keep pouring even when the office mood is gloomy.
Contrast that with exchange-style outfits that make money from trading fees. When retail traders are hyped, revenues explode. When markets calm or crash, the fees evaporate like vape cloud vapor. That’s why several 2025 IPOs that leaned on retail churn saw brutal post-debut drops — investors suddenly priced in the reality that those firms are turbocharged proxies for market volatility, not long-term, steady cash generators.
What this means for 2026 (and anyone dreaming of an IPO)
Public markets are still open to crypto names, but they’re picky. If you want to walk through the IPO door next year, bring provenance: clear revenue paths, transparent compliance, and business models that don’t require perpetual crypto mania to survive. If your pitch depends on “retail trading volume to infinity,” expect a cold call from reality.
This isn’t just market snobbery — it’s basic math. Public investors want compensation for risk. If your earnings vanish when the market hiccups, your stock will get repriced accordingly. If your business looks like financial infrastructure with predictable cash flows, you’ll get treated more like a utility than a high-wire act.
So what counts as a winner next year? Companies that can frame themselves as builders of financial plumbing: regulated stablecoin networks, custody and treasury services, tokenization platforms, or meaningful integrations with institutional products like ETFs. The more you can convince public markets you’re a backbone and not a parade float, the better your chances.
Bottom line: 2025 was a reality check. A few firms proved the model works; many others learned the hard way that crypto equity isn’t the same as token speculation. The IPO window hasn’t shut — it just swung toward folks who can show steady earnings, sensible regulation, and a story that survives a down market. If you don’t have that, you might want to enjoy the private-show circuit until the next cycle rolls around.
